Novelty Textile, Inc. v. Walmart Inc. et al
| Novelty Textile, Inc. |
| DOES 1 through 10, WLLW, LLC and Walmart Inc. |
| 2:2019cv05841 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Otis D Wright |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Pursuant to Plaintiffs Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #22 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1):IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The entire action and all claims asserted therein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 2. All dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. Each party shall bear its own costs. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. (lc)
|
| Filing 22 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Novelty Textile, Inc..(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 21 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) mailed copy to Copyright Office (Attachments: #1 minutes) (lc) |
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Pursuant to Plaintiffs Notice of Voluntary Dismissal and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) as to WLLW, LLC #19 1. The entire action and all claims asserted therein are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 2. All dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Novelty Textile, Inc. pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) of All Remaining Claims as to WLLW, LLC. (Burroughs, Scott) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT WALMART INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE #17 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) Modified on 10/24/2019 (lc).
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Walmart Inc. filed by Plaintiff Novelty Textile, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Burroughs, Scott) |
|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:light of the parties recent Notice of Settlement (ECF No. 15), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than October 24, 2019, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this orderupon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement of Certain Claims filed by Plaintiff Novelty Textile, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 11/25/19 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walmart Inc., (Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Walmart Inc..(Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Walmart Inc. answer now due 8/21/2019, filed by Defendant Walmart Inc..(Attorney Bijal V Vakil added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft))(Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Novelty Textile, Inc., upon Defendant Walmart Inc. served on 7/10/2019, answer due 7/31/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Agent for Service c/o Albert DaMonte in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burroughs, Scott) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants WLLW, LLC, and Walmart Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Novelty Textile, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Novelty Textile, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Novelty Textile, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Novelty Textile, Inc., (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24043531 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Novelty Textile, Inc.. (Attorney Scott A Burroughs added to party Novelty Textile, Inc.(pty:pla))(Burroughs, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
