Stephanie Pulido v. KCorp Support Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Stephanie Pulido
Defendant: KCorp Support Services, Inc. and DOES 1 to 20
Case Number: 2:2019cv05902
Filed: July 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 9/20/2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by defendant(s); or, Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
August 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #13 by Judge Dolly M. Gee #13 . Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause being shown thereby, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendants deadline to respond to Plaintiff' s Complaint is extended to September 4, 2019. (yl)
August 23, 2019 Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 9/4/19 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant KCorp Support Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Robison, Clint)
August 13, 2019 Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to KCorp Support Services, Inc. answer now due 8/23/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant KCorp Support Services, Inc..(Attorney Clint D Robison added to party KCorp Support Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Robison, Clint)
July 31, 2019 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Stephanie Pulido, upon Defendant KCorp Support Services, Inc. served on 7/18/2019, answer due 8/8/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jazmyn Vent, employee of KCorp Support Services, Inc. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Showing Certified Return Receipt of Documents Served)(Horacek, Angel)
July 15, 2019 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant KCorp Support Services, Inc.. (yl)
July 11, 2019 Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Stephanie Pulido. (Horacek, Angel)
July 11, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil)
July 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
July 11, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
July 11, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil)
July 10, 2019 Filing 4 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff Stephanie Pulido. Exhibit A as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . (Horacek, Angel)
July 10, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Stephanie Pulido. (Horacek, Angel)
July 10, 2019 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Stephanie Pulido. (Horacek, Angel)
July 9, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24055607 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Stephanie Pulido. (Attorney Angel James Horacek added to party Stephanie Pulido(pty:pla))(Horacek, Angel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stephanie Pulido v. KCorp Support Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KCorp Support Services, Inc.
Represented By: Perla J Duvel
Represented By: Clint D Robison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 to 20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Pulido
Represented By: Angel James Horacek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?