Sergio Laparra v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Sergio Laparra |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2019cv06235 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 POS)(Attorney In Seon Jeong added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Jeong, In) |
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: granting #9 REQUEST. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order to file proof of service. (sbou)
|
| Filing 9 REQUEST for Extension of Time to file Proof of Service filed by Plaintiff Sergio Laparra. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR by Clerk. Due to clerical error Form CV-11 was not attached to Docket Entry No. #7 . The form (CV-11) is attached to this notice. (Attachments: #1 CV-11) (csi) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS WITH A PRO SE LITIGANT by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Plaintiff shall file an appropriate proof of service within thirty (30) days after the date of this Order. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Social Security), #1 as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (sbou) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (sbou)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (et) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Sergio Laparra. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sergio Laparra. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY DECISION filed against DefendantCommissioner of Social Security. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero., filed by Plaintiff Sergio Laparra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons). (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sergio Laparra v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | In Seon Jeong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sergio Laparra | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
