Malcolm Pye-Williams v. Walgreen Co. et al
| Malcom Pye Williams and Malcolm Pye-Williams |
| 1-10 DOES, Walgreen Co. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv06237 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
(IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES (DKT. #10 ); ANDORDER DISMISSING DOE PARTIES 11-50 by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' 9/6/2019, Joint Report #14 and sets the following deadlines: Deadline to file joint report regarding agreed upon private neutral: 09/30/2019. Last day to amend or add parties: 10/2/2019. Last day to participate in a settlement conference/mediation: 12/13/2019. Last day to file notice of settlement/joint report re settlement: 12/20/2019. Post Mediation Status Conference: 1/13/2020 at 11:30 AM. Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off: 3/31/2020. Initial Expert Disclosures: 04/14/2020. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: 04/28/2020. Expert Discovery Cut-Off: 05/12/2020. Last day to file All Motions (including discovery motions): 05/12/2020. Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 50. (SEE CIVIL MINUTES FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than December 13, 2019. Status Conference set for January 13, 2020 at 11:30 am before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (ake)
|
| Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Malcolm Pye-Williams.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates)(Lovretovich, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by plaintiff Malcolm Pye-Williams.. (Lovretovich, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Malcolm Pye-Williams, (Lovretovich, Joseph) |
|
Filing 11
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION (DKT. #10 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Scheduling Conference is taken under submission. Upon review of the parties Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report, the Court will either issue a scheduling order or set the matter for a hearing. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and no appearance by counsel is necessary on September 16, 2019. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. This matter is set for a Scheduling Conference on 9/16/2019 at 01:30 PM. Report Due: 9/6/2019. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
| Filing 9 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa) |
| COPY OF NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS executed by Plaintiff Malcolm Pye-Williams, upon Defendant Walgreen Co. served on 6/20/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC, Agent of Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 6) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by plaintiff Malcolm Pye-Williams. (Filed in state court 7/18/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 7)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Walgreen Co., Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Malcolm Pye-Williams. (Filed in state court 5/16/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Walgreen Co., re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Notice of Related Case(s) #5 served on July 19, 2019. (Helmer, Leslie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant Walgreen Co.. Related Case(s): None (Helmer, Leslie) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Walgreen Co. identifying Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Helmer, Leslie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walgreen Co., identifying Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.. (Helmer, Leslie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Walgreen Co.. (Helmer, Leslie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 19STCV16992 Receipt No: 0973-24114103 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Walgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7 - Answer to Complaint, #8 Exhibit 8 - Declaration of Amsbary, #9 Exhibit 9 - Declaration of Musgrove, #10 Exhibit 10) (Attorney Leslie Hecht Helmer added to party Walgreen Co.(pty:dft))(Helmer, Leslie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
