Mary Torres et al v. Ventura County Sheriff s Department et al
Mary Torres and Benny Torres |
vu cong dao, County of Ventura, Ventura County Sheriff s Department, DOES 1 THROUGH 50, Inclusive, Edward Busse, ronald chips, Ventura County Sheriffs Office, Eric Dowd and William "Bill" Ayub |
2:2019cv06659 |
July 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
John F Walter |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #28 , Summons Request #27 . The following error(s) was found: Clerk can not issue summons to the Second Amended Complaint as they are premature. There is no Court Order allowing the filing of the Second Amended Complaint. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (iv) |
Filing 29 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Second Amended Complaint #26 . The following error(s) was/were found: Leave of court required for filing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 28 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #26 filed by PLAINTIFF Benny Torres, Mary Torres. (Navab, Kaveh) |
Filing 27 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #26 filed by PLAINTIFF Benny Torres, Mary Torres. (Navab, Kaveh) |
Filing 26 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANTS William "Bill" Ayub, Edward Busse, Ronald Chips, County of Ventura, Vu Cong Dao, Does amending Amended Complaint/Petition #20 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by PLAINTIFF Benny Torres, Mary Torres(Navab, Kaveh) |
Filing 25 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #21 , #22 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. Summons request states see additional defendants on attachment however defendants William Ayub and Eric Dowd have not been included in the caption of the First Amended Complaint. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (iv) |
Filing 24 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First Amended Complaint #20 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 19-1 Complaint/Petition includes more than 10 Does or fictitiously named parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 23 NOTICE Notice of Court Order filed by Plaintiff Benny Torres, Mary Torres. (Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Filing 22 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #20 filed by PLAINTIFF Benny Torres, Mary Torres. (Navab, Kaveh) |
Filing 21 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #20 filed by PLAINTIFF Benny Torres, Mary Torres. (Navab, Kaveh) |
Filing 20 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANT Edward Busse, Ronald Chips, County of Ventura, Vu Cong Dao, Does amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by PLAINTIFF Mary Torres, Benny Torres(Navab, Kaveh) |
Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter: Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for October 21, 2019 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before October 7, 2019. (iv) |
Filing 18 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:19-cv-06659 JFW(AGRx). (rn) (Main Document 17 replaced on 9/6/2019) (rn). |
Filing 16 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROOF OF SERVICE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court reviewed Plaintiffs proof of service. (Docket # 10 - 14.) The previous order is DISCHARGED with no further consequence. re: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #10 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #12 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #11 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #14 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #13 . (vm) |
Filing 15 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c. (Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Filing 14 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Mary Torres, Benny Torres, upon Defendant Edward Busse served on 8/9/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Filing 13 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Mary Torres, Benny Torres, upon Defendant Ronald Chips served on 8/9/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Filing 12 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Mary Torres, Benny Torres, upon Defendant Vu Cong Dao served on 8/27/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Filing 11 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Mary Torres, Benny Torres, upon Defendant County of Ventura served on 8/9/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Filing 10 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Mary Torres, Benny Torres, upon Defendant Ventura County Sheriffs Office served on 8/9/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendants Edward Busse, Ronald Chips, County of Ventura, Ventura County Sheriffs Office. correcting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less),,, #8 (Attachments: #1 Revised Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint By Not More Than 30 Days)(Eicher, James) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Vu Cong Dao answer now due 9/27/2019; Ventura County Sheriffs Office answer now due 9/27/2019; Edward Busse answer now due 9/27/2019; County of Ventura answer now due 9/27/2019; Ronald Chips answer now due 9/27/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Vu Cong Dao; Ventura County Sheriffs Office; Edward Busse; County of Ventura; Ronald Chips.(Attorney James S Eicher added to party Edward Busse(pty:dft), Attorney James S Eicher added to party Ronald Chips(pty:dft), Attorney James S Eicher added to party County of Ventura(pty:dft), Attorney James S Eicher added to party Vu Cong Dao(pty:dft), Attorney James S Eicher added to party Ventura County Sheriffs Office(pty:dft))(Eicher, James) |
Filing 7 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: STATUS REPORT ON SERVICE OF PROCESS INCIVIL ACTION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a statement (not to exceed 3 pages) plus proof of service of process by or before September 11, 2019. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm) |
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Edward Busse, Ronald Chips, County of Ventura, Vu Cong Dao, Ventura County Sheriffs Office. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Benny Torres, Mary Torres, (Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Benny Torres, Mary Torres. (Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Benny Torres, Mary Torres. (Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24184011 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Benny Torres, Mary Torres. (Attorney Hesamedin Aynechi added to party Benny Torres(pty:pla), Attorney Hesamedin Aynechi added to party Mary Torres(pty:pla))(Aynechi, Hesamedin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.