David Hunt et al v. Eaton Employee Benefit Plan et al
| David Hunt and Patti Hunt |
| Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio and Eaton Employee Benefit Plan |
| 2:2019cv07075 |
| August 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(A)(1) #18 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs in this matter. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiff David Hunt, Patti Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Green, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. In light of the Notice of Settlement filed October 31, 2019, the Court sets a hearing on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal for December 16, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. If a stipulated dismissal is filed prior to this date, the matter will be taken off calendar and no appearance is needed. All other dates are hereby vacated. (iv)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff David Hunt, Patti Hunt. (Green, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #14 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Defendants shall have up and including November 12, 2019, to file and serve their responsive pleadings to the Complaint in this action. (iv)
|
| Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to November 12, 2019 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio, Eaton Employee Benefit Plan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fuller, Chad) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jenna Uyen Nguyen counsel for Defendant Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio. Adding Jenna U. Nguyen as counsel of record for Defendant, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio. (Attorney Jenna Uyen Nguyen added to party Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio(pty:dft))(Nguyen, Jenna) |
| Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio answer now due 10/11/2019; Eaton Employee Benefit Plan answer now due 10/11/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio; Eaton Employee Benefit Plan.(Attorney Chad R Fuller added to party Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio(pty:dft), Attorney Chad R Fuller added to party Eaton Employee Benefit Plan(pty:dft))(Fuller, Chad) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-07075 MWF(JPRx). (rn)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Hunt, Patti Hunt, upon Defendant Eaton Employee Benefit Plan served on 8/26/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Charlie Price - Legal Department in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Green, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Hunt, Patti Hunt, upon Defendant Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio served on 8/23/2019, answer due 9/13/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kim Armstrong - Paralegal in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Green, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:19-cv-07075 DDP(JPRx). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio, Eaton Employee Benefit Plan. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Kantor, Lisa) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs David Hunt, Patti Hunt. (Kantor, Lisa) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs David Hunt, Patti Hunt. (Kantor, Lisa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24259073 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs David Hunt, Patti Hunt. (Attorney Lisa S Kantor added to party David Hunt(pty:pla), Attorney Lisa S Kantor added to party Patti Hunt(pty:pla))(Kantor, Lisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
