Cartier Tiggs v. Climatec
Cartier Tiggs |
Climatec LLC and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive |
2:2019cv07122 |
August 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
R Gary Klausner |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Climatec LLC, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Jury Demand #4 served on August 15, 2019. (Witkow, Brandon) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Climatec LLC.. (Witkow, Brandon) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Climatec LLC, identifying Defendant Climatec LLC and Sole Member, Robert Bosch North America Corporation. (Witkow, Brandon) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Climatec LLC. (Witkow, Brandon) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19-STCV-23600 Receipt No: 0973-24269245 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Climatec LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Not of Removal - LASC Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 to Not of Removal - POS, #3 Exhibit 3 to Not of Removal - LASC Answer, #4 Declaration of Jennifer Hudson, #5 Declaration of Robert Miklautsch) (Attorney Brandon J Witkow added to party Climatec LLC(pty:dft))(Witkow, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.