In Re: Shirley Foose McClure
Appellee: Shirley Foose McClure
Appellant: John P. Reitman
Case Number: 2:2019cv07780
Filed: September 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE RE: BANKRUPTCY RECORD COMPLETE. Please note, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010(b)(3), this Court has received from the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court either the record for the above-captioned appeal or notice that the record is available electronically. The parties are responsible for reading and complying with all requirements, including briefing, provided in this notice. Appellant must serve and file a brief by 11/22/2019. (mrgo)
October 22, 2019 Filing 7 Notice of Bankruptcy Appeal Record Availability re Notice of Appeal from Bankruptcy Court Order/Judgment, #1 . (mrgo)
September 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:14-cv-07640 GW. Case transferred from Judge Stephen V. Wilson to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-07780 GW. Signed by Judge George H. Wu (esa)
September 11, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Appellant John P. Reitman. Appellant's Certification Of Interested Parties And Notice Of Related Cases Under C.D. Cal. Rule 2.1 (8012) Re: Notice Of Appeal [Bankr. Doc. No. 1706] Of Bankruptcy Court Order [Bankr. Doc. No. 1689] Related Case(s): 2:14-cv- 07640-GW, 2:15-cv-02745-02745-GW, 2:15-cv-08324-GW, 2:16-cv-02836-GW, 2:17-cv-05460, 2:17-cv-5460- GW, 2:17-cv-05462, 2:18-cv-00698-GW and 2:19-cv-02810-GW (Dalberg, Jon)
September 9, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
September 9, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (lh)
September 9, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 9/09/2019. (lh)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION: Re: Order Denying Motion for Sale of Property and for Compromise of the Claims in the Tidus Litigation entered on 8/26/2019 by Bankruptcy Judge Geraldine Mund, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 9/09/2019. Bankruptcy Court case number: 1:13-bk-10386-GM, Adversary number: None, BAP case number: None., filed by Appellant John P. Reitman. (Attachments: #1 BK Docket) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Shirley Foose McClure
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Shirley Foose McClure
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: John P. Reitman
Represented By: Jon Lincoln Dalberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?