Fabrique Innovations, Inc. v. A.P. Express, LLC
Plaintiff: Fabrique Innovations, Inc.
Defendant: A.P. Express, LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv07904
Filed: September 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Referring Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2019 Filing 26 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, Counterclaim, #19 filed by Defendant Fabrique Innovations, Inc..(Bowles, David)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE #16 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The OSC is discharged and the request for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. (iv)
October 15, 2019 Filing 24 MINUTES OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PRELIMINIARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case called, and counsel make their appearance. The Court invites counsel to present their oral arguments. Arguments by counsel are heard. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court takes the matter under submission. An order will issue. Court Reporter: Amy Diaz. (iv)
October 13, 2019 Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fabrique Innovations, Inc., upon Defendant A.P. Express, LLC served on 9/25/2019, answer due 10/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Melissa Blocker, Receptionist / Authorized to receive service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bowles, David)
October 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference on 01/13/2020 at 11:00 AM. (pg)
October 9, 2019 Filing 21 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: On the Court's own motion, the Order to Show Cause Hearing #16 set for 10/15/2019 is ADVANCED to 9:00 a.m. before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smom) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 8, 2019 Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff A.P. Express, LLC, identifying CIT Group/Commercial Services, inc.; Jeffrey Pont; and Matthew Cass. (Neal, Lisa)
October 8, 2019 Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against Fabrique Innovations, Inc. filed by Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff A.P. Express, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Attorney Lisa N Neal added to party A.P. Express, LLC(pty:dft))(Neal, Lisa)
October 7, 2019 Filing 18 REPLY Support Third APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Shipment of goods Third APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re Shipment of goods . Motion #15 filed by Plaintiff Fabrique Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Malhotra Reply Dec, #2 Exhibit Ex K to Malhotra Reply Dec, #3 Exhibit Ex L to Malhotra Reply Dec, #4 Exhibit Ex M to Malhotra Reply Dec, #5 Exhibit Ex N to Malhotra Reply Dec, #6 Exhibit Ex O to Malhotra Reply Dec, #7 Exhibit Ex P to Malhotra Reply Dec, #8 Exhibit Ex Q to Malhotra Reply Dec, #9 Exhibit Ex R to Malhotra Reply Dec, #10 Exhibit Ex S to Malhotra Reply Dec, #11 Exhibit Ex T to Malhotra Reply Dec, #12 Exhibit Ex U to Malhotra Reply Dec, #13 Exhibit Ex V to Malhotra Reply Dec, #14 Exhibit Ex W to Malhotra Reply Dec, #15 Declaration Zurlnick Reply Dec, #16 Exhibit Ex X to Zurlnick Reply Dec, #17 Exhibit Ex AA to Zurlnick Reply Dec, #18 Declaration Bowles Reply Dec, #19 Exhibit Ex Y to Bowles Reply Dec, #20 Exhibit Ex Z to Bowles Reply Dec, #21 Declaration Springer Reply Dec, #22 Exhibit Ex AB to Springer Reply Dec, #23 Declaration Garfinkel Reply Dec, #24 Proposed Order, #25 Response to objections - Springer 1st, #26 Response to objections - Springer 2nd, #27 Response to objections - Garfinkel, #28 Response to objections - Zurlnick)(Bowles, David)
October 2, 2019 Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by Defendant A.P. Express, LLCto Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order,,,,, Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction,,,, #16 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew J. Cass in Support of Response, #2 Declaration of Lisa N. Neal in Support of Response, #3 Objections to First Declaration of Michael Springer, #4 Objections to Second Declaration of Michael Springer, #5 Objections to Declaration of Sy Garfinkel, #6 Objections to Declaration of Robert Zurlnick, #7 Proposed Order)(Neal, Lisa)
September 24, 2019 Filing 16 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: ORDER RE: THIRD EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #15 .Application is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. Plaintiffs request for a temporary restraining order is denied. However, the Court orders Defendant to show cause as to why a preliminary injunction should not issue. Plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction is denied as moot in light of the Courts order to show cause.The Court is willing to issue an Order to Show Cause (OSC) as to why a preliminary injunction should not be granted. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve the Third Application and this Order on Defendant by September 26, 2019. Defendant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why a preliminaryinjunction should not issue. The briefing schedule and hearing on the OSC are asfollows:Defendant shall file the response to the OSC by October 2, 2019;Plaintiff may file an optional reply by October 7, 2019; and The hearing on the OSC shall be held in Courtroom 5A of the First StreetCourthouse for the United States District Court, Central District of California,located at 350 West First Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, on October 15,2019 at 10:00 a.m. (lc)
September 22, 2019 Filing 15 Third APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Shipment of goods , Third APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re Shipment of goods . Motion filed by Plaintiff Fabrique Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration Garfinkel Dec., #3 Declaration Zurlnick Dec., #4 Exhibit Ex. A to Zurlnick Dec., #5 Exhibit Ex. B to Zurlnick Dec., #6 Exhibit Ex. C to Zurlnick Dec., #7 Exhibit Ex. D to Zurlnick Dec., #8 Exhibit Ex. E to Zurlnick Dec., #9 Exhibit Ex. F to Zurlnick Dec., #10 Declaration 1st Springer Dec., #11 Exhibit Ex. G to 1st Springer Dec., #12 Declaration 2nd Springer Dec., #13 Exhibit Ex. H to 2nd Springer Dec., #14 Exhibit Ex. I to 2nd Springer Dec., #15 Declaration Bowles Dec., #16 Exhibit Ex. J to Bowles Dec.) (Bowles, David)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #12 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Plaintiff's Second Application is DENIED without prejudice. (see document for further details) (bm)
September 18, 2019 Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant A.P. Express, LLC. (iv)
September 18, 2019 Filing 12 Second APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re Shipment of Goods . Motion, Second APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Shipment of Goods filed by Plaintiff Fabrique Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration Garfinkel Declaration, #3 Declaration Zurlnick Declaration, #4 Exhibit Ex. A to Zurlnick Dec., #5 Exhibit Ex. B to Zurlnick Dec., #6 Exhibit Ex. C to Zurlnick Dec., #7 Exhibit Ex. D to Zurlnick Dec., #8 Exhibit Ex. E to Zurlnick Dec., #9 Exhibit Ex. F to Zurlnick Dec., #10 Declaration First Springer Dec., #11 Exhibit Ex. G to First Springer Dec., #12 Declaration Second Springer Dec., #13 Exhibit Ex. H to Second Springer Dec., #14 Exhibit Ex. I to Second Springer Dec., #15 Declaration Bowles Dec., #16 Declaration Bowles Dec. re Service) (Bowles, David)
September 17, 2019 Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Fabrique Innovations, Inc.. (Bowles, David)
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #3 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Plaintiff's Application is DENIED without prejudice. (iv)
September 12, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Fabrique Innovations, Inc., identifying Sy Garfinkel. (Bowles, David)
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-07904 MWF(GJSx). (rn)
September 12, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap)
September 12, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
September 12, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ghap)
September 12, 2019 Filing 4 EXHIBIT A - G to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Continue shipping goods EX PARTE APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re Continue shipping goods . Motion #3 filed by Plaintiff Fabrique Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Emails, #3 Exhibit C - Emails, #4 Exhibit D - Email, #5 Exhibit E - Email, #6 Exhibit F - Invoices, #7 Exhibit G - Email)(Bowles, David)
September 12, 2019 Filing 3 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Continue shipping goods , EX PARTE APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re Continue shipping goods . Motion filed by Plaintiff Fabrique Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Memorandum) (Bowles, David)
September 12, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Fabrique Innovations, Inc.. (Bowles, David)
September 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24428281 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Fabrique Innovations, Inc.. (Attorney David K Bowles added to party Fabrique Innovations, Inc.(pty:pla))(Bowles, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fabrique Innovations, Inc. v. A.P. Express, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fabrique Innovations, Inc.
Represented By: Peter M Cho
Represented By: David K Bowles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A.P. Express, LLC
Represented By: Corey Hayden Collins
Represented By: Lisa N Neal
Represented By: Mary Christine Brady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?