Brian Whitaker v. Westside Properties-2, LLC et al
Brian Whitaker |
Does 1-10, Westside Properties-2, LLC and SL Ramen Santa Monica, Inc |
2:2019cv07946 |
September 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Rozella A Oliver |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant SL Ramen Santa Monica, Inc filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of service) (Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 13 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Westside Properties-2, LLC filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of service) (Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 11/21/2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant(s) Westside Properties-2, LLC; SL Ramen Santa Monica, Inc did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Westside Properties-2, LLC served on 10/5/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe -Assistant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant SL Ramen Santa Monica, Inc served on 10/5/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Robin Doe - General Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (cb) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants SL Ramen Santa Monica, Inc, Westside Properties-2, LLC. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24431409 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.