Lesley K Bronson v. Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC
| Lesley K Bronson |
| Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv08083 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| John F Walter |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 7/10/2020 at 10:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 7/17/2020 at 10:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 7/28/2020 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on November 4, 2019 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: March 23, 2020. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: March 27, 2020. (iv)
|
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan 3-5 days ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Lesley K Bronson.. (Starr, Robert) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter: Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for November 4, 2019 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before October 21, 2019. (iv)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-08083 JFW (GJSx). (esa)
|
| Filing 9 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Lesley K Bronson.. (Starr, Robert) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jp) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ELECTRONICALLY FILED ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 08/16/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHMENT NO. 2 OF EXHIBIT 2 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ). (jp) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ELECTRONICALLY FILED COMPLAINT against Defendants Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC., Does 1 through 100, inclusive, filed by plaintiff Lesley K Bronson. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 07/12/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHMENT NO. 1 OF EXHIBIT 1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ). (jp) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC, re Jury Demand #5 , Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 , Notice (Other) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 09/18/2019. (Wolf, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC.. (Wolf, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Re-Filing State Court Answer filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC. (Attachments: #1 A State Court Answer)(Wolf, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC identifying Jaguar Land Rover Limited, which is a subsidiary of Jaguar Land Rover Holdings Limited, which is a subsidiary of Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC, which is a subsidiary of TML Holdings Pte. Ltd., which is a subsidiary of Tata Motors Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Wolf, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC. (Wolf, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Barbara Superior Court, case number 19CV03624 with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 09/18/2019, receipt number 26K9LH9M), filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 01 State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 02 State Court Answer, #3 Exhibit 03 Sale contract/lease, #4 Exhibit 04 Sale contract/lease) (Attorney Matthew C Wolf added to party Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC (pty:dft))(Wolf, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
