Proline Distribution Services, Inc. v. Rhino Boss LLC
| Proline Distribution Services, Inc. |
| Rhino Boss LLC dba Body Boss, Rhino Boss LLC and Rhino Boss LLC an Ohio limited liability company doing business as Body Boss |
| 2:2019cv08147 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson. On October 24, 2019, the plaintiff filed a request for entry of default by clerk against the interests of the defendant(s). Default by clerk was entered on October 25, 2019. Plaintiff is hereby directed to file a motion for default judgment or, other appropriate dispositive motion on or before November 25, 2019. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 11 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Rhino Boss LLC an Ohio limited liability company doing business as Body Boss. (mrgo) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Rhino Boss LLC filed by Plaintiff Proline Distribution Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Decl. of James R. Galliver in Support of Request to Enter Default) (Astourian, Paro) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson. (Show Cause Response due by 10/30/2019.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Proline Distribution Services, Inc., upon Defendant Rhino Boss LLC served on 10/1/2019, answer due 10/22/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Maria Wilson, authorized agent to accept service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Astourian, Paro) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, 2 Summons, 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement are attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Rhino Boss LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Paro Astourian counsel for Plaintiff Proline Distribution Services, Inc.. Adding James R. Galliver as counsel of record for Proline Distribution Services, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Proline Distribution Services, Inc.. (Astourian, Paro) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24470919 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Proline Distribution Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Attorney Paro Astourian added to party Proline Distribution Services, Inc.(pty:pla))(Astourian, Paro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
