Proline Distribution Services, Inc. v. Rhino Boss LLC
Plaintiff: Proline Distribution Services, Inc.
Defendant: Rhino Boss LLC dba Body Boss
Case Number: 2:2019cv08147
Filed: September 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1330
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24470919 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Proline Distribution Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Attorney Paro Astourian added to party Proline Distribution Services, Inc.(pty:pla))(Astourian, Paro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Proline Distribution Services, Inc. v. Rhino Boss LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Proline Distribution Services, Inc.
Represented By: Paro Astourian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rhino Boss LLC dba Body Boss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?