Stephen Bushansky v. Wesco Aircraft Holdings, Inc. et al
| Stephen Bushansky |
| Paul E. Fulchino, Robert D. Paulson, Jennifer M. Pollino, Jay L. Haberland, Adam J. Palmer, Todd Renehan, Scott E. Kuechle, Randy J. Snyder, Dayne A. Baird, Wesco Aircraft Holdings, Inc., Norton A. Schwartz and Thomas M. Bancroft III |
| 2:2019cv08274 |
| September 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Stephen Bushansky. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Elkins, Joel) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Stephen Bushansky. upon Dayne A. Baird waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Thomas M. Bancroft III waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Paul E. Fulchino waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Jay L. Haberland waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Scott E. Kuechle waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Adam J. Palmer waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Robert D. Paulson waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Jennifer M. Pollino waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Todd Renehan waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Norton A. Schwartz waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Randy J. Snyder waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019; Wesco Aircraft Holdings, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019. Waiver of Service signed by J. Christian Word. (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service of Summons, #2 Waiver of Service of Summons, #3 Waiver of Service of Summons, #4 Waiver of Service of Summons, #5 Waiver of Service of Summons, #6 Waiver of Service of Summons, #7 Waiver of Service of Summons, #8 Waiver of Service of Summons, #9 Waiver of Service of Summons, #10 Waiver of Service of Summons, #11 Waiver of Service of Summons)(Elkins, Joel) |
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-08053 SVW(MAAx). Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-08274 SVW(MAAx). Signed by Judge Stephen V. Wilson (rn)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Stephen Bushansky. Related Case(s): 2:19-cv-08053 (Elkins, Joel) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Stephen Bushansky, (Elkins, Joel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Stephen Bushansky. (Elkins, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24493338 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Stephen Bushansky. (Attachments: #1 Certification Pursuant to Federal Securities Laws) (Attorney Joel E Elkins added to party Stephen Bushansky(pty:pla))(Elkins, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
