Michelle Frohling v. Standard Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Michelle Frohling
Defendant: Standard Insurance Company, Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2019cv08487
Filed: October 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2019 Filing 19 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Standard Insurance Company answer now due 12/2/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Standard Insurance Company.(Altura, Jordan)
November 1, 2019 Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
October 31, 2019 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Rebecca A Hull on behalf of Defendant Standard Insurance Company (Attorney Rebecca A Hull added to party Standard Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Hull, Rebecca)
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Re Stipulation for Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendant Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan Only (DKT. #15 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, The Court finds good cause to GRANT the Stipulation. Accordingly, Indevus shall be dismissed from this action without prejudice, with the Parties to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Defendant Standard Insurance Company shall remain the only named defendant in this action. (jp)
October 24, 2019 Filing 15 First STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan filed by Plaintiff Michelle Frohling. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Calvert, Scott)
October 22, 2019 Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Standard Insurance Company answer now due 11/15/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Standard Insurance Company.(Attorney Jordan S Altura added to party Standard Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Altura, Jordan)
October 11, 2019 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michelle Frohling, upon Defendant Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan served on 10/9/2019, answer due 10/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Beth Miles, Receptionist in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Horrow, Michael)
October 11, 2019 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michelle Frohling, upon Defendant Standard Insurance Company served on 10/9/2019, answer due 10/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montenegro - Agent for CT Corp in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Horrow, Michael)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (jp)
October 4, 2019 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan. (jp)
October 4, 2019 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Standard Insurance Company. (jp)
October 3, 2019 Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #7 filed by Plaintiff Michelle Frohling. (Attachments: #1 Summons request)(Horrow, Michael)
October 2, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write "see attached." Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jp)
October 2, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp)
October 2, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jp)
October 1, 2019 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michelle Frohling. (Horrow, Michael)
October 1, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Michelle Frohling, identifying Michelle Frohling; Standard Insurance Company; Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan. (Horrow, Michael)
October 1, 2019 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Michelle Frohling. (Attachments: #1 Summons request)(Horrow, Michael)
October 1, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24536662 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Michelle Frohling. (Attorney Michael B Horrow added to party Michelle Frohling(pty:pla))(Horrow, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michelle Frohling v. Standard Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Frohling
Represented By: Michael B Horrow
Represented By: Scott E Calvert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Standard Insurance Company
Represented By: Jordan S Altura
Represented By: Rebecca A Hull
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?