Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Hikvision USA Inc.
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant: Hikvision USA Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv08630
Filed: October 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E McDermott
Referring Judge: S James Otero
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2019 Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Hikvision USA Inc., Counter Claimant Hikvision USA Inc. identifying Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co., Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Corr, Steven)
November 27, 2019 Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND on Patent Non-infringement and Invalidity, COUNTERCLAIM against Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. filed by Defendant Hikvision USA Inc..(Corr, Steven)
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT TO NOVEMBER 29, 2019 #13 by Judge S. James Otero (lc)
October 29, 2019 Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Hikvision USA Inc. answer now due 11/27/2019, filed by defendant Hikvision USA Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Regarding Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint by not more than 30 days)(Attorney Steven John Corr added to party Hikvision USA Inc. (pty:dft))(Corr, Steven)
October 18, 2019 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc., upon Defendant Hikvision USA Inc. served on 10/11/2019, answer due 11/1/2019. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Hatch, Ryan)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE PATENT PILOT PROGRAM by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer to Judge S. James Otero for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:19-cv-08630 SJO(JEMx). (rn)
October 8, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rabicoff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh)
October 8, 2019 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Hikvision USA Inc. (lh)
October 8, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
October 8, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh)
October 7, 2019 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Hatch, Ryan)
October 7, 2019 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Hatch, Ryan)
October 7, 2019 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Hatch, Ryan)
October 7, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Hatch, Ryan)
October 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24568601 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16) (Attorney Ryan E Hatch added to party Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.(pty:pla))(Hatch, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Hikvision USA Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Represented By: Ryan E Hatch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hikvision USA Inc.
Represented By: Steven John Corr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?