Angela Florentina Meza v. Sean Patrick Arnold
Angela Florentina Meza |
Sean Patrick Arnold and Does 1 to 20 |
2:2019cv08859 |
October 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A Scheduling Conference has been placed on calendar for March 9, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. The Conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 16(b). Trial counsel must be present and there are no telephonic appearances. Counsel are ordered to file a joint statement providing a brief factual summary of the case, including the claims being asserted. The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference, and to file a joint statement with the Court not later than 14 days after they confer, as required by F.R. Civ.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to give notice of the scheduling conference to each party that makes an initial appearance in the action after this date. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/2/2020. (sw) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Sean Patrick Arnold.(Motschenbacher, Aaron) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (lh) |
NON-CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Angela Florentina Meza, upon Defendant Sean Patrick Arnold served on 9/13/2019, answer due 10/4/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lance Arnold in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Sean Patrick Arnold, Does 1 to 20, filed by Plaintiff Angela Florentina Meza. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/04/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL, DOCUMENT 1-1 #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sean Patrick Arnold, identifying Weyrick Companies, Inc. and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Motschenbacher, Aaron) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sean Patrick Arnold. (Motschenbacher, Aaron) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from uperior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 19STCV31448 Receipt No: 0973-24608520 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Sean Patrick Arnold. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Filings: Complaint, Civil Case Cover Sheet, Summons, Notice of Case Assignment - Unlimited Civil Case, Standing Order Re: Personal Injury Procedures, Central District, and Certificate of Mailing re: PI General Order, Standing Order re PI Procedures and Hearing Dates, #2 Exhibit Proof of Service, #3 Exhibit February 22, 2019 demand letter) (Attorney Aaron S Motschenbacher added to party Sean Patrick Arnold(pty:dft))(Motschenbacher, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.