Melissa Escobar v. Molly Hill
| Melissa Escobar |
| Molly Hill |
| 2:2019cv08925 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: granting #6 APPLICATION for Extension of Time. It is hereby ordered that Respondent is GRANTED to and including February 3, 2020, to file an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (sbou)
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DECLARATION OF TAYLOR NGUYEN filed by Respondent Molly Hill. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Nguyen, Taylor) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Taylor Nguyen, Deputy Attorney General on behalf of Respondent Molly Hill. (Attorney Taylor T Nguyen added to party Molly Hill(pty:res))(Nguyen, Taylor) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. that Respondent Molly Hill file Answer to the Petition not later than 12/5/2019. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 11/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (sbou)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Melissa Escobar. The Petitioner does not consent. (car) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Melissa Escobar. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Melissa Escobar v. Molly Hill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Melissa Escobar | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Molly Hill | |
| Represented By: | Taylor T Nguyen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
