Yong Koo v. Maplewood Ventres, Inc. et al
| YONG KOO |
| MAPLEWOOD VENTURES, INC., MICHAEL E. DOWNS, TRUSTEE OF DOWNS TRUST, Michael E. Downs and Maplewood Ventures, Inc. doing business as Shabu Hyang |
| 2:2019cv08969 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Maplewood Ventures, Inc. answer now due 1/8/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Maplewood Ventures, Inc..(Attorney Jan Nicholas Marfori added to party Maplewood Ventures, Inc.(pty:dft))(Marfori, Jan) |
Filing 13
ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH CLAIM #9 by Judge R. Gary Klausner:the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. The Court therefore dismisses that claim without prejudice. See 28 USC Sub-section 1367(c)(2) and (c)(4). (SEE CIVIL MINUTES FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Yong Kooto Order to Show Cause, #9 , Striking Electronically Filed Documents (G-106) - optional html form, #11 re Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner re Response #10 . The following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): Other error(s) with document(s): Document contains single-spaced text. LR. 11-3.6. The response may be refiled by 12 noon on November 1, 2019. (es)
|
| Filing 10 *STRICKEN BY ORDER OF THE COURT #11 * RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Yong Kooto Order to Show Cause, #9 re Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) Modified on 10/31/2019 (es). |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than 10/30/2019. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 USC 1367(c). (jp)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Michael E. Downs, Maplewood Ventures, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff YONG KOO, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff YONG KOO. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff YONG KOO. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24625309 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff YONG KOO. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party YONG KOO(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
