Rafael Herrera v. Mophie, Inc. et al
| Rafael Herrera |
| Mophie, Inc. and Does 1-50, Inclusive |
| 2:2019cv09383 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| John E McDermott |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel Scott Silverman counsel for Defendant Mophie, Inc.. Adding Daniel S. Silverman as counsel of record for Mophie, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant Mophie, Inc.. (Attorney Daniel Scott Silverman added to party Mophie, Inc.(pty:dft))(Silverman, Daniel) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Mophie, Inc. answer now due 1/13/2020, re Summons Issued #13 filed by defendant Rafael Herrera.(Silverman, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Mophie, Inc. (bm) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #11 filed by Plaintiff Rafael Herrera. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #9 . The following error(s) was found: Case number and judge's initials are not indicated in the caption of the attached document. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (bm) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #7 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Rafael Herrera. (Friedman, Todd) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-09383 PSG(JEMx). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Rafael Herrera. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rafael Herrera, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rafael Herrera. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24706207 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Rafael Herrera. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Rafael Herrera(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
