Sharona Nomder Kaikov v. United Airlines, Inc. et al
| Sharona Nomder Kaikov |
| United Airlines, Inc., Doe No. 1 Flight Attendant and Does 2 to 100, Inclusive, and each of them |
| 2:2019cv09576 |
| November 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Gail J Standish |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Answer to First Amended Complaint) filed by Defendant United Airlines, Inc..(Worthe, Todd) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant United Airlines, Inc.. (Worthe, Todd) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by defendant United Airlines, Inc... (Worthe, Todd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant United Airlines, Inc., identifying Plaintiff, Sharona Nomder Kaikov; Defendant, United Airlines, Inc; and Insurance Global Aerospace Inc.. (Worthe, Todd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 19STCV22109 Receipt No: 0973-24745637 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant United Airlines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Service of Process Transmittal, #3 Exhibit Correspondence, #4 Exhibit First Amended Complaint) (Attorney Todd Christopher Worthe added to party United Airlines, Inc.(pty:dft))(Worthe, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
