Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Reference Watch LLC et al
Plaintiff: Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant: Courtney Ormond, Reference Watch LLC d/b/a/ La Californienne, Leszek Garwacki, Reference Watch LLC and Reference Watch LLC doing business as La Californienne
Case Number: 2:2019cv09796
Filed: November 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R Gary Klausner
Referring Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2019 Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Leszek Garwacki, Courtney Ormond, Reference Watch LLC.(Attorney Willmore F Holbrow, III added to party Leszek Garwacki(pty:dft), Attorney Willmore F Holbrow, III added to party Courtney Ormond(pty:dft), Attorney Willmore F Holbrow, III added to party Reference Watch LLC(pty:dft))(Holbrow, Willmore)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner: granting #8 Non-Resident Attorney Adam W Sgro APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., designating Matthew Scott Bellinger as local counsel. (et)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner: granting #7 Non-Resident Attorney Beth M Frenchman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., designating Matthew Scott Bellinger as local counsel. (et)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner: granting #6 Non-Resident Attorney Brian W Brokate APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., designating Matthew Scott Bellinger as local counsel. (et)
December 5, 2019 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., upon Defendant Leszek Garwacki served on 11/25/2019, answer due 12/16/2019; Courtney Ormond served on 11/25/2019, answer due 12/16/2019; Reference Watch LLC served on 11/25/2019, answer due 12/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon attorney in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bellinger, Matthew)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-09796 RGK (JPRx). (esa)
November 18, 2019 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Leszek Garwacki, Courtney Ormond and Reference Watch LLC. (jtil)
November 18, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
November 18, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil)
November 15, 2019 Filing 8 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Adam W. Sgro to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24790115) filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Bellinger, Matthew)
November 15, 2019 Filing 7 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Beth M. Frenchman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24790070) filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Bellinger, Matthew)
November 15, 2019 Filing 6 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brian W. Brokate to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24790011) filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Bellinger, Matthew)
November 15, 2019 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Bellinger, Matthew)
November 15, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., identifying Rolex Industries Inc., Plaintiff's parent company. (Bellinger, Matthew)
November 15, 2019 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Bellinger, Matthew)
November 15, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Bellinger, Matthew)
November 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24789807 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6) (Attorney Matthew Scott Bellinger added to party Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.(pty:pla))(Bellinger, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Reference Watch LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Courtney Ormond
Represented By: Willmore F Holbrow, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reference Watch LLC d/b/a/ La Californienne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leszek Garwacki
Represented By: Willmore F Holbrow, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reference Watch LLC
Represented By: Willmore F Holbrow, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reference Watch LLC doing business as La Californienne
Represented By: Willmore F Holbrow, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Scott Bellinger
Represented By: Kimberly Ann Kennedy
Represented By: Beth M Frenchman
Represented By: Brian W Brokate
Represented By: Adam W Sgro
Represented By: Craig S Summers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?