Chase Panning v. Cox Communications Inc.
Chase Panning |
Cox Communications Inc, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Cox Communications Inc. |
2:2019cv09799 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:19-cv-02248 JVS (JDEx). (lh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Cox Communications Inc, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on November 15, 2019. (Miller, Philip) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Cox Communications Inc, (Patch, Richard) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Cox Communications Inc. (Patch, Richard) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, case number 30-2019-01100799-CU-BT-CXC Receipt No: 0973-24788608 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Cox Communications Inc. (Attorney Richard R Patch added to party Cox Communications Inc(pty:dft))(Patch, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.