Curtisha Jenkins v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Curtisha Jenkins |
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and WebBank |
| 2:2019cv09843 |
| November 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement With Equifax Information Services, LLC filed by Plaintiff Curtisha Jenkins. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Equifax Information Services, LLC answer now due 2/3/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Thomas P Quinn, Jr on behalf of Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC (Attorney Thomas P Quinn, Jr added to party Equifax Information Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Quinn, Thomas) |
Filing 13
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE RE: WEBBANK #12 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Having been advised by counsel that plaintiff has settled its claims with WebBank, the action as to defendant WebBank is hereby dismissed, without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown, no later than January 31, 2020, to re-open the action as to the subject defendant if the settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. (iv)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement with Defendant WebBank filed by Plaintiff Curtisha Jenkins. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:19-cv-09843 FMO(RAOx). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant WebBank. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Curtisha Jenkins. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Curtisha Jenkins. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 3 Plaintiff's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Curtisha Jenkins. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24795672 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Curtisha Jenkins. (Attorney Previn A Wick added to party Curtisha Jenkins(pty:pla))(Wick, Previn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
