Augusto Lopez v. Andrew M. Saul
Augusto Lopez |
Andrew M. Saul |
Andrew Saul |
2:2019cv10043 |
November 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Stephen V Wilson |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Attorney Paul H Sachelari added to party Andrew M. Saul(pty:dft))(Sachelari, Paul) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA; Title page is missing (See Local Rule 11-3.8 Title Page). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
Filing 10 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Augusto Lopez, upon Defendant Andrew M. Saul acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 12/16/2019, answer due 1/6/2020. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Benjamin Feld, Attorney. (Feld, Benjamin) |
Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Social Security] by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. THE COURT'S CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER HAS BEEN REVISED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2016. PLEASE REVIEW THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. In accordance with General Order 05-01, this case is designated for electronic filing. A chambers copy is required only for the joint stipulation and the certified administrative record. In order to facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this case, the parties shall comply with the following instructions: (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-25) - optional html form #6 . Document number 6 due to clerical error. The defendant correct name is Andrew M. Saul and not Andrew Saul attach the entire image of the new action. (ghap) |
Filing 6 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 11/26/2019, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 7] NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) Modified on 11/26/2019 (ghap). |
Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiff Augusto Lopez. (Feld, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Augusto Lopez, (Feld, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Augusto Lopez. (Feld, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24839299 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Augusto Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appeals Council Denial) (Attorney Benjamin Paul Feld added to party Augusto Lopez(pty:bkmov))(Feld, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.