Truonghai Thai Nguyen v. M. Pollard
| Truonghai Thai Nguyen |
| M. Pollard |
| 2:2019cv10118 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| John F Walter |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS against Respondent Truonghai Thai Nguyen amending Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 , filed by Petitioner Truonghai Thai Nguyen (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10, #10 Part 11, #11 Part 12, #12 Part 13, #13 Part 14, #14 Part 15, #15 Part 16, #16 Part 17, #17 Part 18, #18 Part 19).(sbou) |
| Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: granting #6 REQUEST for Extension of Time. The Request is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file his written response to the OSC by no later than February 27, 2020. (See document for details.) (sbou) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Extension of Time filed by Petitioner Truonghai Thai Nguyen. (sbou) |
Filing 5
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR UNTIMELINESS by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than January 13, 2020 why this Court should not recommend dismissal of this action as untimely. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Voluntary Dismissal Form) (clee)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (clee)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (esa) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by petitioner Truonghai Thai Nguyen. The petitioner does not consent. (esa) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero, (Filing fee $ 5 due), filed by petitioner Truonghai Thai Nguyen. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Truonghai Thai Nguyen v. M. Pollard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: M. Pollard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Truonghai Thai Nguyen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
