Ker Lu v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Ker Lu |
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
2:2019cv10205 |
December 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Alka Sagar |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Jury Demand #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on December 2, 2019. (Chu, Derrick) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, identifying Daimler North America Corporation. (Chu, Derrick) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC.. (Chu, Derrick) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. (Chu, Derrick) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV38631 Receipt No: 0973-24874373 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -Plaintiff's Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- Defendant's Answer to Complaint, #3 Exhibit C- Lease Agreement) (Attorney Derrick Y Chu added to party Mercedes-Benz USA LLC(pty:dft))(Chu, Derrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.