Kyu Hwa Back v. Mark Tran et al
| KYU HWA BACK |
| DOES 1 through 10, LASSEN DESOTO LLC, MARK TRAN and Mark Tran doing business as Super 99 Plus |
| 2:2019cv10335 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE (JS-6) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: In light of the Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal (Dkt. #17 ), the Court orders the case dismissed with prejudice and vacates all deadlines and dates. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (droj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Kyu Hwa Back. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Kyu Hwa Back pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Mark Tran. (Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 15
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On April 24, 2020, default was entered against Defendants (Dkt. #14 ). The Court sets the hearing on the motion for default judgment for August 31, 2020 at 8:30 AM; the motion shall be served on Defendant and filed with the Court no later than July 27, 2020. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 14 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Defendants Lassen Desoto LLC, Mark Tran dba Super 99 Plus. (jp) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendants Lassen Desoto LLC, Mark Tran filed by Plaintiff Kyu Hwa Back. (Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 12
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than April 23, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall file an application requesting the entry of default. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to respond will result in the dismissal of this matter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kyu Hwa Back, upon Defendant Lassen Desoto LLC served on 1/23/2020, answer due 2/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kyu Hwa Back, upon Defendant Mark Tran served on 1/23/2020, answer due 2/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Doing Business As in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 9
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION RE DEFENDANTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than April 16, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the absence of showing good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). An action may be dismissed prior to such time if the Plaintiff fails diligently to prosecute the action. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Lassen Desoto LLC, Mark Tran. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff KYU HWA BACK, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff KYU HWA BACK. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff KYU HWA BACK. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24904111 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff KYU HWA BACK. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party KYU HWA BACK(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
