Brian Whitaker v. Gabrielle Beth Amado et al
| Brian Whitaker |
| Does 1-10, Roger Stuart Clothes, Inc., Ellen E. Amado, Gabrielle Beth Amado, Theodore M. Amado, Jessica Reina Amado and Micah Solomon Amado |
| 2:2019cv10453 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, having been advised by the Plaintiff that this action has been settled by a Notice of Settlement #20 , hereby orders this action dismissed without prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case vacated and taken off calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction for sixty (60) days to vacate this order and to reopen the action upon showing of good cause that the settlement has not been completed. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of service)(Seabock, Amanda) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. This claim is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff to assert it in state court. The Court retains jurisdiction over Plaintiff's ADA claim. (iv)
|
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Jessica Reina Amado served on 12/26/2019, answer due 1/16/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 17 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Theodore M. Amado.(Attorney Fred M Szkolnik added to party Theodore M. Amado(pty:dft))(Szkolnik, Fred) |
| Filing 16 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Micah Solomon Amado.(Attorney Fred M Szkolnik added to party Micah Solomon Amado(pty:dft))(Szkolnik, Fred) |
| Filing 15 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Jessica Reina Amado.(Attorney Fred M Szkolnik added to party Jessica Reina Amado(pty:dft))(Szkolnik, Fred) |
| Filing 14 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Gabrielle Beth Amado.(Attorney Fred M Szkolnik added to party Gabrielle Beth Amado(pty:dft))(Szkolnik, Fred) |
| Filing 13 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Ellen E. Amado.(Attorney Fred M Szkolnik added to party Ellen E. Amado(pty:dft))(Szkolnik, Fred) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitakerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #8 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Gabrielle Beth Amado served on 12/29/2019, answer due 1/21/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon David Shabah - Co occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Micah Solomon Amado served on 12/16/2019, answer due 1/6/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Ellen E. Amado served on 12/16/2019, answer due 1/6/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause as to why it should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim for similar reasons. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order to Show Cause by January 3, 2019. (iv)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ellen E. Amado, Gabrielle Beth Amado, Jessica Reina Amado, Micah Solomon Amado, Theodore M. Amado, Roger Stuart Clothes, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24929256 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
