M. S. v. United States of America et al
Mitchell Scharton and M. S. |
Sharyl Solis, Agapito Ramirez, Alfred Solis, United States Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DOES and Does 1 through 10 |
2:2020cv00043 |
January 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L Abrams |
Stephen V Wilson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mitchell Scharton. (Ounjian, Robert) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mitchell Scharton. (Ounjian, Robert) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mitchell Scharton. (Ounjian, Robert) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mitchell Scharton. (Ounjian, Robert) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mitchell Scharton. (Ounjian, Robert) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Appointment of John Scharton as Guardian ad Litem for M.S. filed by Plaintiff Mitchell Scharton. (Ounjian, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25049567 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Mitchell Scharton. (Attorney Robert John Ounjian added to party Mitchell Scharton(pty:pla))(Ounjian, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.