Orlando Garcia v. The Honey Baked Ham Company, LLC, et al
Orlando Garcia |
Does 1-10, The Honey Baked Ham Company, LLC, and Honey Baked Ham Inc. |
2:2020cv00951 |
January 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Patrick J Walsh |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. upon Honey Baked Ham Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/5/2020, answer due 5/4/2020. Waiver of Service signed by William A. Adams. (Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 14 Summons Issued as to the First Amended Complaint/Petition #11 as to Defendant Honey Baked Ham Inc., a California Corporation (yl) |
Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Montgomery, Elliott) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Orlando Garcia (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Does, The Honey Baked Ham Company, LLC, amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia(Montgomery, Elliott) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Elliott Montgomery on behalf of Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. Filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia (Attorney Elliott Charles Montgomery added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Montgomery, Elliott) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant The Honey Baked Ham Company, LLC, served on 2/3/2020, answer due 2/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montenegro in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant The Honey Baked Ham Company, LLC. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25221668 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.