Hilton Mincy v. Los Angeles Police Department et al
Hilton Mincy |
Donovan Anderson, John Doe, Nicholas Garcia, Los Angeles Police Department, Jane Doe A-Z and Los Angeles Police Departments Hollywood-Wilcox Division |
2:2020cv02045 |
March 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Steve Kim |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42:1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Hilton Mincy. (clee) |
Filing 7 OBJECTION TO COURT ORDER AT DOCKET #4 filed by Plaintiff Hilton Mincy. (clee) |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 filed by Plaintiff Hilton Mincy. (hr) |
![]() |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (car) |
Filing 2 PLAINTIFF'S LIST OF EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF CIVIL COMPLAINT #1 Filed filed by Plaintiff Hilton Mincy. (car) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim, filed by Plaintiff Hilton Mincy. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.