John B. Dunning et al v. Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company et al
Dunning, John B Dunning and Robert R Purdue |
Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company, Googain, Inc., Does 1 through 50 and Googain, Inc. a Corporation doing business as Maxreal Property |
2:2020cv02455 |
March 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gail J Standish |
Otis D Wright |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 The hearing on the MOTION TO REMAND #9 and MOTION TO DISMISS #11 , scheduled for May 18, 2020 at 1:30 P.M., are hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matters stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 19 REPLY Corrected NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Correct NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case AND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #10 #11 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HALLMARK'S MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Defendant Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF WILLIAM C. MORISON IN SUPPORT OF HALLMARKS MOTION TO DISMISS)(Morison, William) |
Filing 18 REPLY NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 filed by Plaintiffs John B Dunning, Robert R Purdue. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of S. Michael Kernan in Support of Plaintiffs' Reply)(Kernan, Stephen) |
Filing 17 OBJECTION Opposition re: Corrected NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Correct NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case AND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #10 #11 filed by Plaintiffs John B Dunning, Robert R Purdue. (Kernan, Stephen) |
Filing 16 to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Opposition re: Corrected NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Correct NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case AND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #10 #11 filed by Plaintiffs John B Dunning, Robert R Purdue. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of S. Michael Kernan in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration, #5 Exhibit D to Declaration, #6 Exhibit E to Declaration, #7 Exhibit F to Declaration)(Kernan, Stephen) |
Filing 15 DEFENDANT HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND 9 re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 filed by Defendant Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF WILLIAM C. MORISON IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND)(Morison, William) |
Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case AND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #10 , for the following reasons: all the documents are attached incorrectly; Review discrepancy on docket no. 12. (lc) |
Filing 13 COUNSEL ARE NOTIFIED, the Motion to Remand #9 and Motion to dismiss #11 are CONTINUED to May 18, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case AND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. Other error(s) with document(s): Missing LR 6.1 formal Notice of Motion TEXT re hearing date, time, Judge and courtroom and Street Location information.. pdf is Incomplete as to Notice and Motion portion. Clerk NOTES filer CORRECTLY REFILED complete Motion documents as docket no. 11. However, now same motion is on Judge's Motion Calendar twice for 4/27/20 (docket no. 11. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 11 Corrected NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Correct NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case AND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #10 filed by Defendant Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company. Motion set for hearing on 4/27/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 DEFENDANT HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYS REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT [FRCP 12(b)(6)], #3 Proposed Order) (Morison, William) |
Filing 10 (STRICKEN PER 3/30/2020 ORDER, DOCKET NO. 14) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case AND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company. Motion set for hearing on 4/27/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 DEFENDANT HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYS REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT [FRCP 12(b)(6)], #3 Proposed Order) (Morison, William) Modified on 3/30/2020 (lc). |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiffs John B Dunning, Robert R Purdue. Motion set for hearing on 4/27/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration) (Kernan, Stephen) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information.. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Plaintiffs amending Complaint - (Discovery), JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiffs John B Dunning, Robert R Purdue (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C to Complaint)(Kernan, Stephen) |
Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company. (Morison, William) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 . The following error(s) was found: Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately and in the correct event. The correct event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company, filed by Plaintiffs John B Dunning, Robert R Purdue. Filed in state Court on 2/13/2020 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company, identifying American Hallmark Insurance Company of Texas, and Hallmark Financial Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burnick, Dean) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV06029 Receipt No: ACACDC-25727955 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Dean C Burnick added to party Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company (pty:dft))(Burnick, Dean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.