Brian Sawyers v. United States of America
Petitioner: Brian Sawyers
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2020cv03113
Filed: April 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Ronald SW Lew
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: GRANTING #5 EX PARTE APPLICATION AUTHORIZING DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS; (2) ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR OBTAINING SUCH ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS, (3) IMPLEMENTING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR SUCH OBTAINED COMMUNICATIONS; AND (4) AMENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS SECTION 2255 MOTION. (shb)
April 17, 2020 Filing 5 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for (1) AUTHORIZING DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS; (2) ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR OBTAINING SUCH ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS, (3) IMPLEMENTING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR SUCH OBTAINED COMMUNICATIONS; AND (4) AMENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS 2255 MOTION filed by Respondent United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Antony, Anil)
April 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Currently before the Court is Defendant Brian Sawyers' Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, 202 , filed on April 2, 2020. The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Government's Opposition: April 27, 2020; Defendant's Reply: May 29, 2020. The Motion will be deemed submitted upon receipt of any Reply o on the expiration of the Reply deadline. (shb)
April 6, 2020 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Anil J Antony counsel for Respondent United States of America. Adding Anil J. Antony as counsel of record for United States of America for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent United States of America. (Attorney Anil J Antony added to party United States of America(pty:res))(Antony, Anil)
April 2, 2020 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM of Law in in Support filed by petitioner Brian Sawyers. Re: Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) #1 . (ghap)
April 2, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew for motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (ghap)
April 2, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 USC 2255 assigned to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. For docketing entries refer to CR Case # 2:15-cr-70-RSWL-1, filed by petitioner Brian Sawyers. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brian Sawyers v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brian Sawyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Anil J Antony
Represented By: Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney LA-CR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?