Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc. v. Sexual MD Solutions, LLC
| Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc. |
| Sexual MD Solutions, LLC |
| 2:2020cv03152 |
| April 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1337 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #22 filed by Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jon Cieslak, #2 Exhibit 1 to Cieslak Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 to Cieslak Declaration)(McWilliams, Rasheed) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #21 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Sexual MD Solutions, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 6/22/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 REQUEST OF DEFENDANT SEXUAL MD SOLUTIONS, LLC FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE) (Karic, Steven) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Steven S Karic on behalf of Defendant Sexual MD Solutions, LLC (Attorney Steven S Karic added to party Sexual MD Solutions, LLC(pty:dft))(Karic, Steven) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #19 re: order to show cause (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jon Cieslak)(Cieslak, Jon) |
Filing 19
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than May 28, 2020 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jon F Cieslak on behalf of Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc. (Cieslak, Jon) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: granting #14 Non-Resident Attorney Jayashree Mitra APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc., designating Joshua M. Masur as local counsel. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sexual MD Solutions, LLC answer now due 5/20/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc..(Masur, Joshua) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jayashree Mitra to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26094987) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. Other error(s) with document(s): Local counsel's address is inconsistent with CSB and CM. Both have attorney in Redwood City and application has LA address. (Thrasher, Lupe) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jayashree Mitra to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26094987) filed by Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Jayashree Mitra in Support of Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case PRO HAC VICE, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Jayashree Mitra in Support of Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case PRO HAC VICE, #3 Proposed Order) (Masur, Joshua) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jarod Michael Bona counsel for Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc.. Filed by plaintiff NOVUS ANTI-AGING CENTER, INC.. (Bona, Jarod) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc., upon Defendant Sexual MD Solutions, LLC acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 4/8/2020, answer due 4/29/2020. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Jeffrey W. Gutchess, Attorney for Defendant Sexual MD Solutions, LLC. (Masur, Joshua) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS re DEFICIENCY IN ATTORNEY'S BUSINESS OR CONTACT INFORMATION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The contact information for attorneys Jarod Michael Bona, Jon F Cieslak, and Rasheed McWilliams are deficient in that no email address is listed on the Court's docket. If you are counsel of record in a case currently pending in this district and you need to update your business or contact information, you must file and serve Form G-06 ("Notice of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information") in each of your pending cases. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 10
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sexual MD Solutions, LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jayashree Mitra. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc.. (Masur, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc., (Masur, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc.. (Masur, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25966888 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc.. (Attorney Joshua M Masur added to party Novus Anti-Aging Center, Inc.(pty:pla))(Masur, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
