Leeroy Williams v. Lexington Law Firm, et al
Leeroy Williams |
Lexington Law Firm and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2020cv03617 |
April 20, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
George H Wu |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Leeroy Williams. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (mrgo) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Lexington Law Firm. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Leeroy Williams, (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Leeroy Williams. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leeroy Williams. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26148257 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Leeroy Williams. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Leeroy Williams(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.