Legendary Transport, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
Legendary Transport, LLC |
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,, Citibank N.A., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A, JPMorgan Chase & Co., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Does 1 to 1000, inclusive, Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
2:2020cv03636 |
April 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Otis D Wright |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. § 15 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY PENDING JPML RULING. The Parties shall notify the Court of the JPMLs decision within 5 business days of its receipt #37 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 37 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending JMPL Ruling filed by Specially Appearing Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Filing 36 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. upon JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/30/2020, answer due 6/29/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Karin Bohmholdt, Esq. (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 35 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #33 as to defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (lc) Modified on 4/28/2020 (lc). |
Filing 34 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, #33 filed by PLAINTIFF Legendary Transport, LLC. (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 33 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANT JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit March 31, 2020 Email, #2 Exhibit April 1, 2020 Email, #3 Exhibit April 2, 2020 Email, #4 Exhibit April 3, 2020 Inquiry Screen, #5 Exhibit Inquiry Confirmation 1, #6 Exhibit Inquiry Confirmation 2, #7 Exhibit April 7, 2020 Email, #8 Exhibit April 10, 2020 Email, #9 Exhibit April 8, 2020 Error Screen, #10 Exhibit April 17, 2020 Email)(Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 32 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:20-cv-03588 ODW(JCx). Case referred from Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for Discovery. The case number will now read as follows: 2:20-cv-03636 ODW(JCx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (rn) |
Filing 31 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #17 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc) .Modified on 4/24/2020 (lc). |
Filing 30 DECLARATION of ADAM DOLCE IN SUPPORT OF First APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order #17 filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - NY TImes Article)(Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 29 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF First APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order #17 filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 28 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Entry of Decision or Ruling by a Judge of this Court, [27-1]. The following error(s) was/were found: Filer attached previous issued minutes from another case as an exhibit, however prior active electronic headers to that filing remain intact, thus making the current electronic headers illegible to the exhibit. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of Entry of RULING filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Order Denying Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order in Outlet Tile Center v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al., (CV 20-3603-GW-MAAx), entered April 23, 2020 at ECF Dkt. No. 12)(Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Robert J Herrington on behalf of Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Attorney Robert J Herrington added to party JPMorgan Chase & Co.(pty:dft), Attorney Robert J Herrington added to party JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Herrington, Robert) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to First APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order #17 filed by Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paul Beinstein, #2 Declaration Karin L. Bohmholdt-Part 1 w/ Exhibits 1 -8, #3 Declaration Karin L. Bohmholdt-Part 2 w/ Exhibits 9-11)(Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Filing 24 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Filing 23 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co. (Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Specially Appearing Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., identifying Legendary Transport, LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citibank, N.A.. (Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Specially Appearing Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co., identifying Legendary Transport, LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citibank, N.A.. (Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Specially Appearing Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., identifying Legendary Transport, LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citibank, N.A.. (Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Karin Bohmholdt on behalf of Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Attorney Karin Bohmholdt added to party JPMorgan Chase & Co.(pty:dft), Attorney Karin Bohmholdt added to party JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other error(s) with document(s): Docket entry has set ex parte application for erroneous hearing date of 5/11/20 1:30 PM which Does NOT appear on the pdf document itself. Otherwise the ex parte filing remains pending Judge's ruling. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 17 First APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. Application set for hearing on 5/11/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order TRO and OSC) (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information.. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 15 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (esa) |
Filing 14 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (esa) |
Filing 13 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co. (esa) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Citibank N.A. (esa) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Bank of America, N.A. (esa) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC, (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. (Dolce, Adam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26150950 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Legendary Transport, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9) (Attorney Adam D Dolce added to party Legendary Transport, LLC(pty:pla))(Dolce, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.