Brandon Michael Wyse v. Andrew M. Saul
Brandon Michael Wyse |
Andrew M. Saul |
2:2020cv03696 |
April 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Social Security: HIA |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV20-3696 AFM on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Attorney Tina Naicker added to party Andrew M. Saul(pty:dft))(Naicker, Tina) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brandon Michael Wyse, upon Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 5/4/2020, answer due 9/1/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Ruzin, Irene) |
Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by plaintiff Brandon Michael Wyse. (Ruzin, Irene) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (es) |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (esa) |
Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Brandon Michael Wyse. (Ruzin, Irene) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Brandon Michael Wyse, (Ruzin, Irene) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brandon Michael Wyse. (Ruzin, Irene) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brandon Michael Wyse. (Ruzin, Irene) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff Brandon Michael Wyse. (Attorney Irene Ruzin added to party Brandon Michael Wyse(pty:pla))(Ruzin, Irene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brandon Michael Wyse v. Andrew M. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Tina Naicker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brandon Michael Wyse | |
Represented By: | Irene Ruzin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.