Jardine Gougis v. KAZI Foods, Inc. et al
| Jardine Gougis |
| Everlast Investment, LLC, Does 1 to 10, KAZI Foods, Inc., and KAZI Foods, Inc., doing business as Kentucky Fried Chicken No. 105 |
| 2:2020cv03965 |
| April 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE AND DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court hereby orders this action dismissed without prejudice and discharges the pending orders to show cause. All proceedings in the case are hereby vacated and taken off calendar. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougisto Order to Show Cause, #10 , Errata #13 CORRECTED Response to OSC re: Sanctions as to Plaintiff's Counsels (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougis. correcting Response #12 (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougisto Order to Show Cause, #10 re Sanction as to Plaintiffs' Counsels (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougis. (Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OR SANCTIONED by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Mr. Yoon and Mr. Kim are therefore separately ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why they should not be sanctioned for submitting the declaration discussed above. Counsel are DIRECTED to file a response to this order to show cause by June 1, 2020, and are further DIRECTED to respond regardless of whether Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses this action. (iv)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougisto Order to Show Cause, #8 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Cormac J. Carney.The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause as to why it should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim and other state law claims for similar reasons. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order to Show Cause by May 18, 2020. (iv)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Everlast Investment, LLC, KAZI Foods, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JARDINE GOUGIS. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff JARDINE GOUGIS, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JARDINE GOUGIS. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26283927 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff JARDINE GOUGIS. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party JARDINE GOUGIS(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
