Monica Six et al v. Gavin Newsom et al
| Jane Doe, Bailey Batten, Kenneth Ball, Monica Six, Derek Medlin and Laurisue Medlin |
| Xavier Becerra, Sonia Angell, Mark Ghilarducci and Gavin Newsom |
| 2:2020cv04193 |
| May 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiffs Kenneth Ball, Bailey Batten, Jane Doe, Derek Medlin, Laurisue Medlin, Monica Six. (Dhillon, Harmeet) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Kenneth Ball, Bailey Batten, Jane Doe, Derek Medlin, Laurisue Medlin, Monica Six. (Dhillon, Harmeet) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26380990 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintffs Laurisue Medlin, Jane Doe, Derek Medlin, Kenneth Ball, Monica Six, Bailey Batten. (Attorney Harmeet K Dhillon added to party Kenneth Ball(pty:pla), Attorney Harmeet K Dhillon added to party Bailey Batten(pty:pla), Attorney Harmeet K Dhillon added to party Jane Doe(pty:pla), Attorney Harmeet K Dhillon added to party Derek Medlin(pty:pla), Attorney Harmeet K Dhillon added to party Laurisue Medlin(pty:pla), Attorney Harmeet K Dhillon added to party Monica Six(pty:pla))(Dhillon, Harmeet) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
