Alfonzo Montes v. FCA US LLC et al
Alfonso Montes |
Does 1-10 and FCA US LLC |
2:2020cv04395 |
May 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER RE JURY TRIAL by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Last Day to Add/Amend Pleadings due by 11/2/2020. Non-expert Discovery cut-off 3/2/2021. Last Day to Conduct ADR Proceeding 4/26/2021. File Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law, Exhibit and Witness Lists, Status Report regarding settlement, and all Motions in Limine by 5/24/2021. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/1/2021. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motion in Limine set for 6/14/2021 at 11:00AM. Trial Date (4 days) 7/6/2021 at 8:30AM. (SEE THE SECOND PAGE OF THIS ORDER FOR FURTHER THE SPECIFIED DATES). (et) |
Filing 11 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 4/26/2021. (iv) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Pursuant to the Central District of California's Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP), the Court VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for 7/6/2020 at 11:00am. No appearances shall be made. The Court will review the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and issue pretrial and trial dates by separate order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smom) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC.. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference on 7/6/2020 at 11:00 AM. (iv) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 20STCV11697 Receipt No: ACACDC-26457146 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. Filed in State Court on 5/7/2020 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, FCA US LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Alfonso Montes. Filed in State Court on 3/24/2020 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.