Harout Azaryan v. Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Harout Azaryan
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 2:2020cv04494
Filed: May 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Patricia A Donahue
Referring Judge: Patricia Donahue
2 Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV20-4494 PD on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
June 15, 2020 Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Attorney Patrick W Snyder added to party Andrew M. Saul(pty:dft))(Snyder, Patrick)
June 11, 2020 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Harout Azaryan, upon Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 6/8/2020, answer due 10/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Ruzin, Irene)
May 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Patricia A Donahue. (see document for details) (hr)
May 28, 2020 Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by plaintiff Harout Azaryan. (Ruzin, Irene)
May 19, 2020 Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (ghap)
May 19, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Donahue. (ghap)
May 19, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Harout Azaryan, (Ruzin, Irene)
May 19, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Harout Azaryan. (Ruzin, Irene)
May 19, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Harout Azaryan. (Ruzin, Irene)
May 19, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26493604 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Harout Azaryan. (Attorney Irene Ruzin added to party Harout Azaryan(pty:pla))(Ruzin, Irene)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harout Azaryan v. Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Patrick W Snyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harout Azaryan
Represented By: Irene Ruzin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?