Brandon Che Lee v. Warden et al
Brandon Che Lee |
Adams, Warden, Cortez, Delpato, Santana, Rawls, Guzman, Otero, Zaqueta, Williamson, Green, Avery, Saucillo, Chica, Loomrs, Johnson, Byers and Macras |
2:2020cv04787 |
May 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Karen L Stevenson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, no later than July 10, 2020, why the action should not be dismissed. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Civil Rights Complaint Form, #2 Blank CV-60P Form) (hr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) filed by plaintiff Brandon Che Lee. (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendantsAdams, Avery, Byers, Chica, Cortez, Delpato, Green, Guzman, Johnson, Loomrs, Macras, Otero, Rawls, Santana, Saucillo, Warden, Williamson, Zaqueta pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, filed by plaintiff Brandon Che Lee. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.