DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al
| DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT |
| OFFICER CAMERON GOBBLE, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv04841 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT, upon Defendant OFFICER CAMERON GOBBLE served on 7/20/2020, answer due 8/10/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Officer Cameron Gobble in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kizzie, Antonio) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES, (Smith, Colleen) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES.(Attorney Colleen R Smith added to party CITY OF LOS ANGELES(pty:dft))(Smith, Colleen) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT, upon Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES served on 6/18/2020, answer due 7/9/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon STACEY ROBERTS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kizzie, Antonio) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:20-cv-04841 CBM(JCx). (rn) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES and OFFICER CAMERON GOBBLE. (Attachments: #1 CGobble) (jtil) |
| Filing 8 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT. (Diggs, Rodney) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Antonio K Kizzie counsel for Plaintiff DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT. Adding Antonio K. Kizzie as counsel of record for Plaintiff, Darren Deon Honeycutt for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Antonio K. Kizzie. (Attorney Antonio K Kizzie added to party DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT(pty:pla))(Kizzie, Antonio) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT. (Diggs, Rodney) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT. (Diggs, Rodney) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT, (Diggs, Rodney) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT. (Diggs, Rodney) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26623179 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT. (Attorney Rodney S Diggs added to party DARREN DEON HONEYCUTT(pty:pla))(Diggs, Rodney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
