Trinidad Garcia Lopez v. Andrew Saul
| Trinidad Garcia Lopez |
| Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
| 2:2020cv05322 |
| June 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Sheri Pym |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Trinidad Garcia Lopez, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 7/16/2020, answer due 11/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Amended Proof of Service on U.S. Attorney's Office only-other two offices accepted service (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Trinidad Garcia Lopez, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 6/24/2020, answer due 10/22/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Deborah L. Stachel, Regional Chief Counsel, Office of the Regional Chief Counsel-Region IX. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Koenig, Andrew) |
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHERI PYM [SOCIAL SECURITY]: PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM SIMILAR ORDERS BY OTHER JUDGES: Plaintiff shall promptly serve the summons and complaint and a copy of this order on defendant in the manner required by Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 20 C.F.R. 423.1. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service showing compliance with this paragraph within 30 days of the date of this order. Defendants counsel shall file a notice of appearance within 30 days of service of the summons and complaint. Defendant shall electronically serve on plaintiff a complete copy of the administrative record within 90 days of the service of the complaint (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (kca)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (es) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (kca)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Trinidad Garcia Lopez, identifying Joe Solomon. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Trinidad Garcia Lopez. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Trinidad Garcia Lopez. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Trinidad Garcia Lopez. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Trinidad Garcia Lopez. (Attorney Andrew Thomas Koenig added to party Trinidad Garcia Lopez(pty:pla))(Koenig, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
