Pouran Mirtaheri al v. Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
Plaintiff: Pouran Mirtaheri
Defendant: Does 2 to 20, inclusive, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc., Apollo Global Management, Inc. and John Doe 1
Petitioner: SF Markets, LLC and Single Source Security, Inc. dba Protos Security
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Richard T. Copeland and Richard Copeland
3Rd Party Plaintiff: SF Markets LLC
3Rd Party Defendant: Roes
Case Number: 2:2020cv05351
Filed: June 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
2 Judge: Virginia A Phillips
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE: TAKING THREE INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS OF PLAINTIFF, POURAN MIRTAHERI PURSUANT TO FRCP 35(B)(6) #56 by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. The parties, by and through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE and this Court approves thereof, that the defense will take three (3) Independent Medical Examinations of Plaintiff, in accordance with all of the recitals, as well as all of the terms and conditions, of the Joint Stipulation (see document for further details). (hr)
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 56 Joint STIPULATION for Discovery as to Plaintiff's IMEs filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Propose Order re: Joint Stipulation re IMEs)(Bachert, Julie)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 55 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Third Party Complaint #54 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom)
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 54 Third-Party Defendant, SINGLE SOURCE SECURITY, INC., dba PROTOS SECURITY ANSWER to Third Party Complaint #46 filed by Third Party Defendant Single Source Security, Inc. dba Protos Security.(Fazel, Domineh)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 53 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: The parties are advised that the Court has updated its standing orders effective June 15, 2021 (i.e., Standing Order for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., Mandatory Scheduling Conference (MSC) Order, Order Re: Motions for Summary Judgment, Pretrial and Trial Order). These orders apply to all pending cases, except as follows: (1) the updated Order Re: Motions for Summary Judgment (MSJ) does not apply to any MSJ filed on or before July 27, 2021; and (2) the updated Pretrial and Trial Order does not apply to any case with a pretrial conference set on or before July 22, 2021. The parties are directed to read and comply with all these standing orders except as noted in the prior sentence. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrey) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 52 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File May 17, 2021, STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 25, 2021 filed by Third Party Defendant Single Source Security, Inc. dba Protos Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Attorney Domineh Fazel added to party Single Source Security, Inc. dba Protos Security(pty:3pd))(Fazel, Domineh)
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 51 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Third-Party Plaintiff SF Markets LLC, upon Third-Party Defendant Single Source Security, Inc. dba Protos Security served on 4/26/2021, answer due 5/17/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Blake Vaughan, Director of Finance in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. AFFIDAVID OF SERVICE (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of Service)(Melo, Mark)
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 50 21 DAY Summons Issued re Third Party Complaint #46 as to third-party defendant Single Source Security, Inc. dba Protos Security. (mrgo)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 49 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice (Other) #48 , Third Party Complaint #46 , Summons Request #47 filed by Third-Party Plaintiff Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. (Melo, Mark)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 48 NOTICE filed by Third-Party Plaintiff Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. NOTICE OF ERRATA RE THIRD-PARTY SUMMONS (Melo, Mark)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 47 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Third Party Complaint #46 filed by Third-Party Plaintiff Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. (Melo, Mark)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 46 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Third-Party Defendant Single Source Security, Inc. dba Protos Security, filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc..(Melo, Mark)
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE: GRANTING OF LEAVE FOR SF MARKETS, LLC TO FILE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Upon Stipulation #44 , Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff SF Markets, LLC are granted leave to file its proposed Third-Party Complaint against Third-Party Defendant Single Source Security, Inc. Defendant shall act promptly to serve Single Source Security, Inc. to avoid any unnecessary delay. (gk)
April 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 44 Joint STIPULATION for Leave to to File Third-Party Complaint filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Melo, Mark)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court deems as moot the Ex Parte Application to Withdraw for Order to Extend Trial Date and Related Pre-Trial Deadlines Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of the Parties filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. #35 and the Ex Parte Application to Continue Trial Date and Related Pre-Trial Deadlines Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of the Parties from 10/4/2021 to 2/7/2022 filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. #38 , and taken off this Court's calendar. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
March 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER GRANTING LAST STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 10/4/2021 TRIAL DATE AND RELATED PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Upon Stipulation #39 , Initial Expert Designation due 9/24/2021. Rebuttal Expert Designation due 10/8/2021. Discovery cut-off 11/19/2021. Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing Cut-Off 1/7/2022. Jury Trial set for 2/7/2022 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Pretrial Conference set for 1/28/2022 11:00 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties are advised that there shall be NO FURTHER CONTINUANCES. (gk)
March 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 41 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re (Proposed) Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Continue October 4, 2021 Trial and related Pre-Trial Deadlines re Stipulation to Continue, #39 , Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form, #40 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Continue October 4, 2021 Trial and related Pre-Trial Deadlines)(Melo, Mark)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 40 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation to Continue, #39 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 39 Joint STIPULATION to Continue TRIAL DATE AND RELATED PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES from October 4, 2021 to February 7, 2022 Re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue TRIAL DATE AND RELATED PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES PURSUANT TO THE JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES from October 4, 2021 to February 7, 2022 #38 filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc..(Melo, Mark)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 38 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue TRIAL DATE AND RELATED PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES PURSUANT TO THE JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES from October 4, 2021 to February 7, 2022 filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of MIM, #2 Exhibit 1 to Dec MIM, #3 Exhibit 2 to Dec MIM, #4 Exhibit 3 to Dec MIM, #5 Exhibit 4 to Dec MIM, #6 Exhibit 5 to Dec MIM, #7 Exhibit 6 to Dec MIM, #8 Exhibit 7 to Dec MIM, #9 Exhibit 8 to Dec MIM, #10 Exhibit 9 to Dec MIM, #11 Proposed Order) (Melo, Mark)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES PURSUANT TO JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIES #36 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr as follows: Initial Expert Designation: 5/21/2021; Rebuttal Expert Designation: 6/4/2021; Discovery cut-off: 7/16/2021; Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing Cut-Off: 8/27/2021 at 2:00 PM; Pretrial Conference : 9/24/2021 at 11:00 AM; Jury Trial: 10/4/2021 at 8:30 AM. (jp)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 36 Joint STIPULATION to Continue TRIAL DATE AND RELATED PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES from June 8, 2021 to October 5, 2021 Re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Withdraw FOR ORDER TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE AND RELATED PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES PURSUANT TO THE JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES #35 filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc..(Melo, Mark)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 35 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Withdraw FOR ORDER TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE AND RELATED PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES PURSUANT TO THE JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Lindy Bradley, #2 Exhibit A to Decl. of LFB, #3 Exhibit B to Decl. of LFB, #4 Exhibit C to Decl. of LFB, #5 Exhibit D to Decl. of LFB, #6 Proposed Order) (Melo, Mark)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court strikes the REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Apollo Global Management, Inc. #32 , without prejudice to refiling it upon correction of the deficiencies by 1/13/2021, see Dkt. No. #33 . Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 33 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: Request for Default Against Defendant Apollo Global Management, Inc. #32 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Proof of Service is lacking required information. The Affidavit of Service lacks the statute under which service was made. The return receipt for the certified mail service has not been filed with the Court. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. (gk)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 32 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER CIVIL MINUTES OF 12/30/2020, SEE DOCKET NO. 34] First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Apollo Global Management, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri. Request set for hearing on 12/21/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Balady, Michelle) Modified on 1/4/2021 (gk).
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than December 21, 2020 why Defendant Apollo Global Management, Inc. should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date: Answer by the Defendant(s) or Plaintiff's request for entry of default. See minute order for details. (lom)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 30 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri, upon Defendant Apollo Global Management, Inc. served on 10/5/2020, answer due 10/26/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Balady, Michelle)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 29 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #28 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days). The filer used the event, Proof of Service (subsequent documents), for docketing this filing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 DECLARATION OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri, served on Summons, Complaint, Alternative Dispute Resolution Package and Civil Case Cover Sheet. (Balady, Michelle)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 27 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Richard Copeland may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 12/9/2020 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri(Balady, Michelle)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 26 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Richard Copeland has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Richard Copeland, Esq. may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 11/17/2020 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri(Balady, Michelle)
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Richard T. Copeland has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-151) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., this case is transferred from Judge Virginia A. Phillips to the calendar of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-05351 SB(RAOx). (rn)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Richard Copeland, Esq. may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 11/6/2020 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri(Balady, Michelle)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 CIVIL TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Initial Designation of Expert Witnesses due by: January 25, 2021, Designation of Rebuttal Expert Witnesses due by: February 8, 2021, Summary Judgment Motion hearing cut-off by May 3, 2021 at 2:00 p.m., Last day to conduct mediation: December 14, 2020, Trial Estimate: 2 days. Amended Pleadings due by 12/22/2020. Discovery cut-off 3/22/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 5/24/2021 at 02:30 PM. Jury Trial set for 6/8/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than December 14, 2020. (cch)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report. (Dkt. 13). The Court adopts the following schedule (note changes from the parties' requested dates): Last date for hearing motions to amend pleadings or add parties: 12/22/2020;Last date to conduct settlement conference (ADR no. 2): 12/14/2020; Initial Expert Disclosures: 1/25/2021; Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: 2/8/2021; All Discovery cutoff: 3/22/2021; Last date for hearing non-discovery motions: 5/3/2021; Pre-trial conference (hearing on motions in limine): 5/24/2021 at 2:30 p.m.; Trial date (jury trial, 2 days):6/8/2021 at 8:30 a.m. As it was not discussed in the 26(f) Report, the parties are encouraged to consider consenting to proceed before a magistrate judge for all purposes in accordance with Local Rule 73-3. (bm)
August 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. COUNSEL ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, on the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set on August 31, 2020 is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR and VACATED. No appearance by counsel will be necessary. The Court will issue such further orders as deemed appropriate. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 2 filed. Parties request to appear before a neutral selected from the court's Mediation Panel for mediation. Filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.(Bradley, Lindy)
August 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REMAND (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips denying #11 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court: For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion for Remand. (see document for further details) (bm)
August 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri, (Balady, Michelle)
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPLY in support of First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to California (Stanley Mosk) #11 filed by Plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri. (Balady, Michelle)
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Pre-Trial ; estimated length of trial 5-6 days, filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Timetable)(Bradley, Lindy)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to California (Stanley Mosk) #11 OPPOSITION filed by Defendant Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark I. Melo (MIM), #2 Exhibit A to MIM Decl., #3 Exhibit B to MIM Decl., #4 Exhibit C to MIM Decl., #5 Exhibit D to MIM Decl., #6 Exhibit E to MIM Decl., #7 Exhibit F to MIM Decl., #8 Exhibit G to MIM Decl., #9 Exhibit H to MIM Decl., #10 Exhibit I to MIM Decl.)(Attorney Mark I Melo added to party Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.(pty:dft))(Melo, Mark)
July 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to California (Stanley Mosk) filed by Plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri. Motion set for hearing on 8/31/2020 at 02:00 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Balady, Michelle)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other error(s) with document(s): Motion is incorrectly noticed in front of Judge Carney. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm)
July 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Stanley Mosk filed by Plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri. Motion set for hearing on 8/31/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Balady, Michelle)
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Scheduling Conference set for 8/31/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) Complaint filed by SF Markets, LLC Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc..(Markie, Anastasia)
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
June 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
June 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil)
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Pouran Mirtaheri in Los Angeles Superior Court on 3/4/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil)
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant SF Markets, LLC, identifying Sprouts Farms Markets Holdings, LLC and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc.. (Markie, Anastasia)
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant SF Markets, LLC. (Markie, Anastasia)
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV09027 Receipt No: ACACDC-26832321 - Fee: $400, filed by SF Markets, LLC SF Markets, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint) (Attorney Anastasia Markie added to party SF Markets, LLC(pty:bkmov))(Markie, Anastasia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pouran Mirtaheri al v. Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pouran Mirtaheri
Represented By: Michelle C Balady
Represented By: Shawn Azizzadeh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SF Markets, LLC
Represented By: Anastasia Markie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Single Source Security, Inc. dba Protos Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 2 to 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
Represented By: Anastasia Markie
Represented By: Mark I Melo
Represented By: Lindy F Bradley
Represented By: Julie Ann Bachert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Richard T. Copeland
Represented By: Richard T Copeland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Richard Copeland
Represented By: Richard T Copeland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: SF Markets LLC
Represented By: Julie Ann Bachert
Represented By: Lindy F Bradley
Represented By: Mark I Melo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: Roes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?