Erica Lee v. Walmart Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Erica Lee
Defendant: MR Walmart Inc., Walmart Inc. and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv05439
Filed: June 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Patricia Donahue
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2020 Filing 15 Receipt of acknowledgment letter from Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, 312 N. Spring St., Los Angeles, 90012. Case No. 19STCV22235. (bm)
October 2, 2020 Filing 14 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, Spring Street Courthouse. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, Spring Street Courthouse. (gk)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING AMOUNT OF CONTROVERSY NOT TO EXCEED $75,000.00 AND REMAND TO STATE COURT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation #12 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matter be Remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case number 19STCV22235. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) (gk)
September 29, 2020 Filing 12 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Plaintiff Erica Lee.(Zeven, Alek)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 10/30/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
July 29, 2020 Filing 10 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On July 22, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff has filed a response to the Order to Show Cause re Lack of Prosecution on July 27, 2020. The Court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 27, 2020 (CONFORMED COPY) ANSWER to Complaint #1 filed by Defendant Walmart Inc. [e-filed on 10/28/2019 with Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 19STCV22235] (gk)
July 27, 2020 Filing 9 DECLARATION of Vanessa M. Hooker, Esq. re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #8 filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Answer)(Hooker, Vanessa)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER [In Chambers] Order to Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. It appears a response from defendant(s) has not been filed. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before August 5, 2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See minute order for details. (lom)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
June 19, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
June 19, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (et)
June 18, 2020 CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Walmart Inc., Does 1 through 50, Inclusive., filed by Plaintiff Erica Lee. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/25/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et)
June 18, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walmart Inc., (Hooker, Vanessa)
June 18, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of State Court File re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Hooker, Vanessa)
June 18, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Hooker, Vanessa)
June 18, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV22235 Receipt No: ACACDC-26870427 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Declaration of Vanessa M. Hooker, Esq.) (Attorney Vanessa Hooker added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft))(Hooker, Vanessa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erica Lee v. Walmart Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erica Lee
Represented By: Alek Zeven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MR Walmart Inc.
Represented By: Vanessa Hooker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Inc.
Represented By: Vanessa Hooker
Represented By: Bron E D'Angelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?