Aliana Echenique Rodriguez v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Aliana Echenique Rodriguez
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2020cv05564
Filed: June 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV20-5564 SK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
July 27, 2020 Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Timothy R Bolin added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Bolin, Timothy)
July 22, 2020 Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Aliana Echenique Rodriguez. (Perales, Monica)
July 22, 2020 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Aliana Echenique Rodriguez, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 7/16/2020, answer due 11/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to General Counsel. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Perales, Monica)
July 10, 2020 Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: NOTICE TO PARTIES by District Judge Cormac J. Carney. Effective July 13, 2020, Judge Cormac J. Carney will be located in the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 9B, on the 9th floor, located at 411 W. 4th Street, Santa Ana, California 92701-4516. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 9B of the Ronald Reagan Federal Buiding and U.S. Courthouse unless otherwise ordered by the Court. All required mandatory chambers copies shall be delivered and placed in the drop box located on the 9th Floor of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse. Judge Carneys Courtroom Deputy Clerk, may be reached at CJC_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. The location for filing civil and/or criminal documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing is at the Clerks Office, Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, located at 411 W. 4th Street, Santa Ana, California 92701-4516. Documents under this exemption may also be filed in the Los Angeles or Riverside courthouses. Please refer to Judge Carneys Procedures and Schedules Page on the Courts website **UPDATED AS OF JULY 9, 2020** for updated procedures regarding mandatory chambers copies. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (see document for details). (Attachments: #1 Blank Consent Form) (et)
June 25, 2020 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (et)
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (et)
June 24, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap)
June 23, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Aliana Echenique Rodriguez, (Perales, Monica)
June 23, 2020 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Aliana Echenique Rodriguez. (Perales, Monica)
June 23, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Aliana Echenique Rodriguez. (Perales, Monica)
June 23, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Aliana Echenique Rodriguez. (Perales, Monica)
June 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Aliana Echenique Rodriguez. (Attorney Monica Perales added to party Aliana Echenique Rodriguez(pty:pla))(Perales, Monica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aliana Echenique Rodriguez v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Timothy R Bolin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aliana Echenique Rodriguez
Represented By: Monica Perales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?