Beijing Bridge To Success Edu and Tech Co., Ltd. v. Muse Global, LLC
Plaintiff: Beijing Bridge To Success Edu & Tech Co., Ltd. and Beijing Bridge To Success Edu and Tech Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Muse Global, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv05929
Filed: July 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
July 2, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. It should have been filed and entered separately under its proper event. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et)
July 2, 2020 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Muse Global, LLC. (et)
July 2, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
July 2, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et)
July 1, 2020 Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Beijing Bridge To Success Edu & Tech Co., Ltd., (Zhu, Keliang)
July 1, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Beijing Bridge To Success Edu & Tech Co., Ltd.. (Zhu, Keliang)
July 1, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27036142 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Beijing Bridge To Success Edu & Tech Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Keliang Clay Zhu added to party Beijing Bridge To Success Edu & Tech Co., Ltd.(pty:pla))(Zhu, Keliang)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beijing Bridge To Success Edu and Tech Co., Ltd. v. Muse Global, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beijing Bridge To Success Edu & Tech Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Keliang Clay Zhu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beijing Bridge To Success Edu and Tech Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Keliang Clay Zhu
Represented By: Yi Yao
Represented By: Jeffrey Louis Fazio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Muse Global, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?