Tracey Bregman v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371 et al
| Tracey Bregman |
| Does 1 through 50 inclusive and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371 |
| 2:2020cv06207 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371.(Hamrick, Alpheus) |
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 9/14/2020 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371 answer now due 8/10/2020, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371.(Dutton, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371, identifying See Notice and Exhibit A thereto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Dutton, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Dutton, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20SMCV00792 Receipt No: ACACDC-27177594 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Jonathan D Dutton added to party Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371(pty:dft))(Dutton, Jonathan) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Tracey Bregman, upon Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371 served on 6/12/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Foley and Lardner, agent for service, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 6/12/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. HGB0135371, Does, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Tracey Bregman. (filed in state court 6/11/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
