U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Co. et al
| U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| DOES 1-10 Inclusive and Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Co. |
| 2:2020cv06741 |
| July 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Co. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Park, Anna) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Park, Anna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attorney Anna Y Park added to party U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(pty:pla))(Park, Anna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
